Global coverage of health information systems for kidney disease: availability, challenges, and opportunities for development

      Development and planning of health care services requires robust health information systems to define the burden of disease, inform policy development, and identify opportunities to improve service provision. The global coverage of kidney disease health information systems has not been well reported, despite their potential to enhance care. As part of the Global Kidney Health Atlas, a cross-sectional survey conducted by the International Society of Nephrology, data were collected from 117 United Nations member states on the coverage and scope of kidney disease health information systems and surveillance practices. Dialysis and transplant registries were more common in high-income countries. Few countries reported having nondialysis chronic kidney disease and acute kidney injury registries. Although 62% of countries overall could estimate their prevalence of chronic kidney disease, less than 24% of low-income countries had access to the same data. Almost all countries offered chronic kidney disease testing to patients with diabetes and hypertension, but few to high-risk ethnic groups. Two-thirds of countries were unable to determine their burden of acute kidney injury. Given the substantial heterogeneity in the availability of health information systems, especially in low-income countries and across nondialysis chronic kidney disease and acute kidney injury, a global framework for prioritizing development of these systems in areas of greatest need is warranted.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      ISN Member Login
      ISN Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Use your society credentials to access all journal content and features.
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • World Health Organization
        Monitoring the building blocks of health systems: a handbook of indicators and their measurement strategies.
        WHO Press, Geneva, Switzerland2010
        • Larsson S.
        • Lawyer P.
        • Garellick G.
        • et al.
        Use of 13 disease registries in 5 countries demonstrates the potential to use outcome data to improve health care’s value.
        Health Aff. 2012; 31: 220-227
        • Parkin D.
        • Bray F.
        • Ferlay J.
        • et al.
        Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000.
        Int J Cancer. 2001; 94: 153-156
        • Han W.
        • Sharman R.
        • Heider A.
        • et al.
        Impact of electronic diabetes registry “Meaningful Use” on quality of care and hospital utilization.
        J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2015; 23: 1-7
        • Hoque D.M.E.
        • Kumari V.
        • Ruseckaite R.
        • et al.
        Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and health outcomes: protocol for a systematic review.
        BMJ Open. 2016; 6: e010654
        • Collins A.J.
        • Foley R.N.
        • Gilbertson D.T.
        • et al.
        United States Renal Data System public health surveillance of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease.
        Kidney Int Suppl. 2015; 5: 2-7
        • Zoccali C.
        • Kramer A.
        • Jager K.
        The databases: renal replacement therapy since 1989-the European Renal Association and European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA).
        Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 4: S18-S22
        • Jin D.-C.
        Dialysis registries in the world: Korean Dialysis Registry.
        Kidney Int Suppl. 2015; 5: 8-11
        • Leung C.B.
        • Cheung W.L.
        • Li P.K.T.
        Renal registry in Hong Kong-the first 20 years.
        Kidney Int Suppl. 2015; 5: 33-38
        • Morsy A.
        • Lim T.O.
        • Varatharajan S.
        • et al.
        National registries in developing countries: understanding construction challenges and implementation steps.
        in: 2010 5th Cairo International Biomedical Engineering Conference, CIBEC 2010. IEEE, 2010: 75-78
        • Mcdonald S.P.
        Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry.
        Kidney Int Suppl. 2015; 5: 39-44
        • Wilcox N.
        • McNeil J.J.
        Clinical quality registries have the potential to drive improvements in the appropriateness of care.
        Med J Aust. 2016; 205: S27-S29
        • Lim T.O.
        • Goh A.
        • Lim Y.N.
        • et al.
        Use of renal registry data for research, health-care planning and quality improvement: what can we learn from registry data in the Asia-Pacific region?.
        Nephrology. 2008; 13: 745-752
        • Hanafusa N.
        • Nakai S.
        • Iseki K.
        • et al.
        Japanese society for dialysis therapy renal data registry - a window through which we can view the details of Japanese dialysis population.
        Kidney Int Suppl. 2015; 5: 15-22
        • Jager K.J.
        • Wanner C.
        Fifty years of ERA-EDTA Registry—a registry in transition.
        Kidney Int Suppl. 2015; 5: 12-14
        • Nwomeh B.C.
        • Lowell W.
        • Kable R.
        • et al.
        History and development of trauma registry: lessons from developed to developing countries.
        World J Emerg Surg. 2006; 1: 32
        • Counil É.
        • Cherni N.
        • Kharrat M.
        • et al.
        Trends of incident dialysis patients in Tunisia between 1992 and 2001.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 2008; 51: 463-470
        • Jedy-Agba E.E.
        • Oga E.A.
        • Odutola M.
        • et al.
        Developing national cancer registration in developing countries – case study of the Nigerian national system of cancer registries.
        Front Public Heal. 2015; 3: 1-10
        • Black N.
        • Barker M.
        • Payne M.
        Cross sectional survey of multicentre clinical databases in the United Kingdom.
        BMJ. 2004; 328: 1478
        • Hanna T.P.
        • Kangolle A.C.T.
        Cancer control in developing countries: using health data and health services research to measure and improve access, quality and efficiency.
        BMC Int Heal Hum Rights. 2010; 10: 24
        • Liu F.X.
        • Rutherford P.
        • Smoyer-Tomic K.
        • et al.
        A global overview of renal registries: a systematic review.
        BMC Nephrol. 2015; 16: 31
      1. The International Society of Nephrology (ISN). ISN Regions. Available at: Accessed August 22, 2017.

      2. World Bank Country and Lending Groups - World Bank Data Help Desk. Available at: Accessed August 22, 2017.

        • Barsoum R.S.
        Overview: end-stage renal disease in the developing world.
        Artif Organs. 2002; 26: 737-746
        • Boutayeb A.
        • Boutayeb S.
        The burden of non communicable diseases in developing countries.
        Int J Equity Health. 2005; 4: 2
        • Mariani L.
        • Stengel B.
        • Combe C.
        • et al.
        The CKD Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (CKDopps).
        Am J Kidney Dis. 2016; 68: 402-413
        • Razeen Davids M.
        • Eastwood J.B.
        • Selwood N.H.
        • et al.
        A renal registry for Africa: first steps.
        Clin Kidney J. 2016; 9: 162-167
        • United States Renal Data System
        2014 USRDS annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. National Institutes of Health.
        National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD2014
        • Valsecchi M.G.
        • Steliarova-Foucher E.
        Cancer registration in developing countries: luxury or necessity?.
        Lancet Oncol. 2008; 9: 159-167
        • Rastogi T.
        • Hildesheim A.
        • Sinha R.
        Opportunities for cancer epidemiology in developing countries.
        Nat Rev Cancer. 2004; 4: 909-917
        • Evans S.M.
        • Scott I.A.
        • Johnson N.P.
        • et al.
        Development of clinical-quality registries in Australia: the way forward.
        Med J Aust. 2011; 194: 360-363
        • Lucas H.
        Information and communications technology for future health systems in developing countries.
        Soc Sci Med. 2008; 66: 2122-2132
        • Drawz P.E.
        • Archdeacon P.
        • McDonald C.J.
        • et al.
        CKD as a Model for Improving Chronic Disease Care through Electronic Health Records.
        Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015; 10: 1488-1499
        • Breckenridge K.
        • Bekker H.L.
        • Gibbons E.
        • et al.
        How to routinely collect data on patient-reported outcome and experience measures in renal registries in Europe: an expert consensus meeting.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015; 30: 1605-1614
        • Schena F.P.
        Epidemiology of end-stage renal disease: international comparisons of renal replacement therapy.
        Kidney Int. 2000; 57: S39-S45
        • Jager K.J.
        • Zoccali C.
        Quality of care in end-stage renal disease: the importance of comparing “apples with apples”.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008; 23: 1116
        • Kjellstrand C.M.
        International comparisons of dialysis survival are meaningless to evaluate differences in dialysis procedures.
        in: Death on Hemodialysis: Preventable or Inevitable? Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, Netherlands1994: 55-68
        • Bello A.K.
        • Levin A.
        • Tonelli M.
        • et al.
        Assessment of Global Kidney Health Care Status.
        JAMA. 2017; 317: 1864
        • Bello A.K.
        • Johnson D.W.
        • Feehally J.
        • et al.
        Global Kidney Health Atlas (GKHA): design and methods.
        Kidney Int Suppl. 2017; 7: 145-153